Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Pharmaceutical Industry (2019–2025): A Descriptive and Inferential Statistical Analysis of Decoupling, Intensity Metrics, and Supply Chain Challenges – Part I

Surinder Deswal1, Phalguni Deswal2

1 Professor, Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra, India.

2 Independent Researcher, India. 

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry’s contribution to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions presents a critical paradox: an inherently health-oriented sector whose operations generate substantial environmental burden. This study presents a comprehensive descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of GHG emissions data from 14 major pharmaceutical companies over 2019–2025, examining emissions trajectories, structural composition, intensity metrics, and drivers of energy intensity. Analysis reveals that Scope 3 emissions dominate carbon footprints, averaging 5.1 million  – approximately 8.7 times greater than Scopes 1 and 2 (combined) mean value. While operational emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) declined substantially, with mean reductions of 41.3% and 61.4% in emissions intensity, respectively, Scope 3 emissions intensity showed only marginal improvement (mean: -17.7%, median: -22.1%). Upstream emissions, particularly purchased goods and services (Category 1), averaged 80.9% of Scope 3 footprints, highlighting supply chain decarbonisation as the primary challenge. While relative decoupling is evident across the sector, absolute decoupling remains elusive, with only 5 of 14 companies exhibiting true decoupling (decoupling ratio >3.0). Correlation analysis revealed moderate negative relationships between revenue and operational emissions intensity (Scope 1: r = -0.42, p < 0.01; Scope 2: r = -0.38, p < 0.01), but no significant correlation with Scope 3 intensity (r = -0.12, p = 0.28). The energy intensity of pharmaceutical manufacturing – driven by cleanroom HVAC systems consuming 50–75% of facility energy – emerges as a critical constraint on Scope 1 reduction. The findings suggest the pharmaceutical industry is progressing toward operational decarbonisation but faces fundamental structural challenges in addressing value chain emissions, with implied warming trajectories diverging between operational (1.5°C-aligned) and supply chain (2°C-aligned) performance. The results of the study carry implications for supplier engagement, process innovation, and collaborative industry action.   
Keywords: Pharmaceutical industry, GHG emissions, Scope 3 emissions, Emissions intensity, Energy intensity, Cleanroom energy consumption, Decoupling ratio, Supply chain decarbonisation

Part 2: Environmental Footprint Beyond Carbon:  A Descriptive and Inferential Statistical Analysis of Energy, Water, and Waste Metrics (Resource Efficiency) in the Pharmaceutical Industry (2019–2025) – Part II

Part 3: Navigating the Complexities of Cross-Company Sustainability Comparisons in the Pharmaceutical Sector: A Methodological Framework for Responsible Interpretation – Part III

References

  1. Booth, A, Jager, A, Faulkner, S.D., et al. (2023) ‘Pharmaceutical company targets and strategies to address climate change: Content analysis of public reports from 20 pharmaceutical companies’, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20(4), 3206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043206
  2. Capgemini (2025) Energy efficiency in the pharmaceutical industry. https://www.capgemini.com
  3. CPI (2022) How sustainable is the pharma industry? Centre for Process Innovation Limited. https://www.uk-cpi.com
  4. DDW (2025) Sustainability in pharma: Series aim and importance. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/category/sustainability-in-pharma/
  5. Deloitte (2023) Pharmaceutical industry sustainability reporting. Deloitte Insights.
  6. Deswal, P. (2025b) What are GHG emissions. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/04/06/what-are-ghg-emissions/
  7. Deswal, P. (2025a) Tracking Environmental Sustainability and GHG Targets in Pharma. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/04/21/tracking-environmental-sustainability-and-ghg-targets-in-pharmaceutical-sector/
  8. Deswal, P. (2025c) ‘Article 6 of the Paris Agreement: A comprehensive review of mechanisms, progress, and persistent challenges’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 1(2), pp. 111-125. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-010235.pdf
  9. Deswal, P. (2025d) CVS Health makes headway in becoming environmentally sustainable. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/07/03/cvs-health-makes-headway-in-becoming-environmentally-sustainable/
  10. Deswal, P. (2025e) ten23 health’s progress towards environmental sustainability. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/06/23/ten23-healths-progress-towards-environmental-sustainability/
  11. Deswal, P. (2025f) Bayer’s efforts in environmental sustainability. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/05/26/bayer-efforts-in-environmental-sustainability/
  12. Deswal, P. (2025g) Sanofi’s progress towards environmental sustainability. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/05/19/sanofis-progress-towards-environmental-sustainability/
  13. Deswal, P. (2025h) Novartis’ march towards achieving Net-zero by 2040. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/05/12/novartis-march-towards-achieving-net-zero-by-2040/
  14. Deswal, P. (2025i) Roche’s progress towards environmental sustainability. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/05/05/roches-progress-towards-environmental-sustainability/
  15. Deswal, P. (2025j) ‘AstraZeneca’s path to net-zero’, Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/04/28/sustainability-astrazeneca-efforts-in-achieving-net-zero/
  16. Deswal, P. (2025k) Carbon neutrality versus net-zero. Drug and Device World. https://druganddeviceworld.com/2025/04/07/carbon-neutrality-versus-net-zero/
  17. Deswal, S. and Deswal, P. (2025a) ‘The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comprehensive review of progress, implementation, and the path forward’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 1(2), pp. 133-141. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-010237.pdf
  18. Deswal, S. and Deswal, P. (2025b) ‘Sustainability: Greenhouse Gas Protocol and global GHG emissions’ status and trends’, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(1), pp. 2051-2063. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2025.6.1.2051-2063
  19. Deswal, S. and Deswal, P. (2026) ‘Navigating the complexities of cross-company sustainability comparisons in the pharmaceutical sector: A methodological framework for responsible interpretation – Part III’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 2(3), pp. 1148-1157. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-0203025.pdf
  20. EFPIA (2023) Net-zero Pharma: Climate action roadmap. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations.
  21. EFPIA (2026) Climate survey report. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Association. https://www.efpia.eu
  22. GHG Protocol (2025) Scope 3 methodological guidance. https://ghgprotocol.org
  23. IPCC (2022) Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
  24. Marsh, J. (2025) From labs to landfills: Pharma’s role in climate and environmental crisis. Illumine. https://illuminem.com/illuminemvoices/from-labs-to-landfills-pharmas-role-in-climate-and-environmental-crisis
  25. McKinsey (2022) Decarbonizing the pharmaceutical supply chain. McKinsey Sustainability, McKinsey & Company .
  26. MGL (2025) 2025 Carbon impact of biotech and pharma report. My Green Lab. https://www.3blmedia.com/news/my-green-lab-report-finds-biotech-and-pharma-operations-15-degree-path-supply-chains-keep
  27. PC (2025) Realistic net-zero goals for pharma. Pharmaceutical Commerce. https://www.pharmaceuticalcommerce.com
  28. PharmOut (2025) Sustainability in pharmaceutical manufacturing: Reducing carbon footprints without compromising GMP. https://www.pharmout.net
  29. SBTi (2023) SBTi corporate net-zero standard. Science Based Targets Initiative.
  30. SCW (2025) Inside pharma’s 2025 green supply chain transformation. Supply Chain Wizard. https://supplychainwizard.com/inside-pharmas-2025-green-supply-chain-transformation/
  31. SLR (2025) Decarbonisation in pharma and healthcare: State of the sector 2025 report. SLR Consulting. https://www.slrconsulting.com/afr/insights/decarbonisation-pharma-healthcare
  32. WHO (2024) Greener pharmaceuticals’ regulatory highway. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/greener-pharmaceuticals-regulatory-highway
  33. WRI and WBCSD (2011) Greenhouse Gas Protocol: corporate value chain (Scope 3) accounting and reporting standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.


Rajshahi Medical College and University of Rajshahi, BANGLADESH.



Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Melbourne, AUSTRALIA.




Agri. Services, Islamabad Model College for Girls, and Riphah International University, PAKISTAN.




Kampala International University, UGANDA; Rivers State University, NIGERIA.


Discover more from International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading