Inclusive WASH Services in Zimbabwe: Gendered and Disability-Related Challenges Faced by Women with Disabilities, Insights from Harare and Bulawayo

Hope Jaricha1, Daniel Masungwa2, Batrice Dzingai3, Notion Manzvera4, Vannessa Runyraro Meki5, Felistas Mutseyi6, Benjamin Tungwa7

1,2,3,4,5,6 Lecturer, Department of Social Work, Julius Nyerere School of Social Sciences, Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.  

7 Lecturer, Department of Social Work, Reformed Church University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe. 

Abstract

Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services is essential for health, dignity, and social inclusion. Yet women with disabilities in Zimbabwe face continued barriers and challenges that limit equitable access to water, sanitation and hygiene services. This study adopts a qualitative case study approach, drawing insights from in-depth interviews with 25 women with physical, sensory, and mobility impairments, complemented by discussions with 10 key informants from local councils and disability focused organisations. The findings reveal multiple intersecting challenges, including inaccessible WASH infrastructure, socio-cultural stigma, limited awareness of disability inclusive policies, and inadequate implementation of national legislation such as the Disabled Persons Act (1996) and the Water Act (1998). Women with disabilities often bear disproportionate caregiving responsibilities, exacerbating the difficulty of accessing safe water and sanitation facilities, while reliance on informal coping mechanisms exposes them to health risks and social exclusion. The findings underscore gaps between policy and practice, highlighting the need for targeted interventions that integrate gender and disability perspectives into WASH programming. Social work practice is crucial in advocating for inclusive service provision, raising awareness, and supporting communities to implement disability-sensitive strategies. By centering the lived experiences of women with disabilities, this study contributes to the growing African social work scholarship on equity, human rights, and inclusive service delivery.    

Keywords: Women with disabilities, WASH access, Zimbabwe, Social work, Gender equity, Inclusive services 

References

  1. Alkire, S. (2005) Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford University Press.
  2. Assefa, G.M., Sherif, S., Sluijs, J., et al. (2021) ‘Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Relation to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia’, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18(8), 4281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084281  
  3. Atkinson, R. and Flint, J. (2001) ‘Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies’, Social Research Update, 33(1), pp. 1–4.
  4. Batchelor, S. and Gershberg, A. (2015) Financing water, sanitation and hygiene for all: Issues and challenges in low-income countries. Routledge.
  5. Black, M., Fawcett, B. and McFarlane, C. (2011) ‘Water, sanitation and human capabilities’, World Development, 39(8), pp. 1360–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.010
  6. Bowen, G.A. (2009) ‘Document analysis as a qualitative research method’, Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), pp. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  7. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101.
  8. Calderón-Villarreal, A., Schweitzer, R. and Kayser, G. (2022) ‘Correction: Social and geographic inequalities in water, sanitation and hygiene access in 21 refugee camps and settlements in Bangladesh, Kenya, Uganda, South Sudan, and Zimbabwe’, Int. J. Equity Health, 21, 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01626-3
  9. Chigumira, T. and Ncube, L. (2025) ‘Survivor pensions and bureaucratic inefficiency in Southern Africa’, African Development Review, 37(3), pp. 405–421.
  10. Chikova, S. and Nyoni, T. (2019) ‘Gendered barriers in WASH: A study of urban women with disabilities in Harare’, Journal of Social Development in Africa, 34(2), pp. 45–64.
  11. Chikwanda, M. and Mulenga, J. (2018) ‘Access to sanitation facilities for women with disabilities in Zambia: A capability approach’, African Journal of Disability, 7, 4. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.4
  12. Chilisa, B. (2020) Indigenous research methodologies. 2nd ed. Sage.
  13. Comim, F., Qizilbash, M. and Alkire, S. (2008) The capability approach: Concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge University Press
  14. Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. SAGE Publications.
  15. CRPD (2007) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
  16. DeJonckheere, M. and Vaughn, L.M. (2019) ‘Semi-structured interviewing in primary care research’, Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(4), e000057.
  17. DPA (1996) Disabled persons act. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2013/11/08/disabled_persons_act.pdf
  18. Dube, K. and Chirisa, I. (2021) ‘Urban poverty, social protection, and WASH services in Harare’, Zimbabwe Journal of Social Work, 18(1), pp. 33–52.
  19. Farid, S., Razzaq, S. and Sajid, M. (2026) ‘Impact of balanced use of fertilizer on crop production and its quality for human health’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 29-38. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-020143.pdf
  20. Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) ‘Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), pp. 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
  21. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) ‘Five misunderstandings about case-study research’, Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), pp. 219–245.
  22. Garba, A. and Abdullahi, M.G. (2026) ‘Evaluation of climatic trends in Dass LGA, Bauchi State, Nigeria’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 52-56. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-020147.pdf
  23. Groce, N., Kett, M. and Trani, J.-F. (2011) ‘Disability and access to WASH services in low-income countries: A critical review’, Waterlines, 30(3), pp. 165–182. https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2011.022
  24. Groce, N., Kett, M., Lang, R. and Trani, J.F. (2013) ‘Disability and poverty: The need for a more nuanced understanding’, World Development, 41, pp. 1–16.
  25. Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006) ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability’, Field Methods, 18(1), pp. 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  26. IFSW (2018) Global social work statement of ethical principles. International Federation of Social Workers.
  27. IRC WASH (2023) WASH systems for health (2023-2028). https://eps.leeds.ac.uk/research-project/52/directories/4729/wash-systems-for-health-2023-2028 
  28. Kahane, D. (2015) ‘Capabilities, health, and water security: The case of marginalized groups’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 16(2), pp. 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2015.1011163
  29. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
  30. Mactaggart, I., Schmidt, W.-P., Bostoen, K., et al. (2018) ‘Access to water and sanitation among people with disabilities: results from cross-sectional surveys in Bangladesh, Cameroon, India and Malawi’, BMJ Open, 8(6), e020077. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020077
  31. Midgley, J. and Conley, A. (2010) Social work and social development: Theories and skills for developmental social work. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.
  32. Mvere, C., Carrol, A., Ravengai, E., et al. (2016) ‘Creating environments to support participation of people with disabilities in public service delivery’, 39th WEDC International Conference, Kumasi, Ghana. https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/conference_contribution/Creating_environments_to_support_participation_of_people_with_disabilities_in_public_service_delivery/9594311?file=17234513 
  33. Mweemba, C., Sikwila, M. and Banda, P. (2019) ‘Access to WASH services by women with disabilities in Zambia’, Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(12), pp. 1450–1460.
  34. NDP (2021) National disability policy [Zimbabwe]. https://veritaswomen.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/National-Disability-Policy-June-20211.pdf
  35. NewsDay Zimbabwe (2025) NewsDay. https://www.newsday.co.zw/
  36. Ntseane, D. and Solo, T. (2017) ‘Gender, disability and social service delivery in Southern Africa’, Journal of Disability Studies, 5(2), pp. 22–37.
  37. Nussbaum, M.C. (2000) Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Okesanya, O.J., Eshun, G., Ukoaka, B.M. et al. (2024) ‘Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices in Africa: exploring the effects on public health and sustainable development plans’, Trop. Med. Health, 52(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-024-00614-3
  39. Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Macmillan.
  40. Padgett, D.K. (2017) Qualitative methods in social work research. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications.
  41. Patton, M.Q. (2015) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th ed. Sage Publications.
  42. Robeyns, I. (2005) ‘The capability approach: A theoretical survey’, Journal of Human Development, 6(1), pp. 93–114.
  43. SADC (2016) Regional strategic action plan on integrated water resources development and management. https://www.sadc.int/sites/default/files/2021-08/SADC_Water_4th_Regional_Strategic_Action_Plan_English_version.pdf
  44. Sen, A. (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
  45. Sen, A. (2001) Inequality re-examined. Harvard University Press.
  46. Shakespeare, T. (2006) Disability rights and wrongs. Routledge.
  47. Shenton, A.K. (2004) ‘Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects’, Education for Information, 22(2), pp. 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  48. Singh, M. and Garg, R. (2026) ‘Sustainable urban water and flood management: A case study of Delhi’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 22-28. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-020142.pdf
  49. SNV Zambia (2022) Impact that matters. https://www.snv.org/country/zambia
  50. UNESCO (2021) UN world water development report. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/reports/wwdr/2021/en
  51. UNHR (2011) Special Rapporteur on the rights to water and sanitation. United Nations Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-water-and-sanitation/about-mandate#:~:text=Subsequently%2C%20the%20Human%20Rights%20Council,aligned%20with%20human%20rights%20criteria
  52. UNICEF (2026) Gender Equality Action Plan, 2026–2029: Accelerating equality, delivering for girls and women. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. https://www.unicef.org/gender-equality/action-plan
  53. UNICEF Zimbabwe (2025) Annual report 2025. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. https://www.unicef.org/media/166161/file/2025-HAC-Zimbabwe.pdf
  54. Veritas Zimbabwe (2020) Disabled Persons Act (Chapter 17:01) commentary. Veritas.
  55. WaterAid (2017) The Undoing Inequity research aims to understand and address the barriers that disabled, older and chronically ill people face when accessing water, sanitation and hygiene services in Zambia and Uganda. https://washmatters.wateraid.org/publications/undoing-inequity
  56. WHO and UNICEF (2017) Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines. World Health Organization and UNICEF.
  57. WHO and UNICEF (2023) Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2022: Special focus on gender. World Health Organization and United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund.
  58. WHO and UNICEF (2025) 1 in 4 people globally still lack access to safe drinking water. World Health Organization and United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund.
  59. WHO and WB (2011) World report on disability 2011. World Health Organization and World Bank.
  60. Yin, R.K. (2018) Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th ed. Sage.

Rajshahi Medical College and University of Rajshahi, BANGLADESH.



Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Melbourne, AUSTRALIA.




Agri. Services, Islamabad Model College for Girls, and Riphah International University, PAKISTAN.




Kampala International University, UGANDA; Rivers State University, NIGERIA.


Discover more from International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading