Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Optimal Production Schedule Choice

Ovundah King Wofuru-Nyenke

Lecturer, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.  

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present a structured approach for selecting the optimal production schedule using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) with the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE). In modern manufacturing environments, production scheduling involves multiple conflicting objectives, and traditional single-objective optimization techniques are often inadequate for addressing these complexities. To overcome this limitation, the scheduling problem is formulated as a multi-criteria decision-making task, where several feasible production schedules (Schedule 1, Schedule 2, Schedule 3, Schedule 4 and Schedule 5) are evaluated simultaneously based on four (4) selected performance criteria namely: production cost, production time, product quality and resource utilization, with preference weights of 0.3, 0.25, 0.25 and 0.2 respectively. The results indicated that Schedule 2 is the best alternative because it has the highest total net flows of 0.325, followed by Schedule 1, which has total net flows of 0.10625. Next is Schedule 3, which has total net flows of 0.05625, followed by Schedule 4, having total net flows of -0.08125, and finally, Schedule 5, which is the worst ranking alternative, having total net flows of -0.3125. Therefore, PROMETHEE proved to be a viable multi-criteria decision-making tool for selecting the most suitable production schedule among the group of alternatives. This study is significant because it provides a procedure for aiding supply chain managers in selecting the best alternative among a group of similar alternatives using PROMETHEE.      

Keywords: Production Scheduling, Manufacturing, Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), PROMETHEE

References

  1. Agrawal, N. (2022) ‘Multi-criteria decision-making toward supplier selection: Exploration of PROMETHEE II method’, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(7), pp. 2122-2146.
  2. Aoufi, T. and Aksa, K. (2025) ‘Strategic roadmap for prioritizing Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing: Integrating DFSS and MCDA approaches’, Jordan Journal of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, 19(2), pp. 297-316.
  3. Brans, J., Mareschal, B., Figueira, J., et al. (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. New York, USA: Springer Science+ Business Media, Inc, pp. 163-196.
  4. Brans, J. and Vincke, P. (1985) ‘Preference ranking organization method-(the Promethee method for multiple criteria decision-making)’, Management Science, 31, pp. 647-656.
  5. Elattar, T.A. and ELWakil, M. (2026) ‘Integrating MCDM approaches into modern quality control: A review of methods, challenges, and Industry 4.0 synergies’, Benha Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3(1), pp. 86-113.
  6. Igbokwe, N.C., Nwamekwe, C.O. and Okpala, C.C. (2026) ‘Manufacturing waste reduction through data-driven process optimization: Evidence from smart production systems’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 165-174. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-020167.pdf
  7. Ishizaka, A. and Nemery, P. (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Khan, A., Asad, M.W.A. and Baisheng, N. (2026) ‘A parametric block clustering technique for production scheduling of open pit mines under grade uncertainty’, International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2026.2613860
  9. Okpala, C.C. (2026) ‘Human-centered design of jigs and fixtures: A data-driven approach to productivity, safety, and manufacturing sustainability’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 291-299. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-020185.pdf
  10. Okpala, C.C., Ezeanyim, O.C., Kenneth, O.S., et al. (2026) ‘From Kaizen to digital continuous improvement: Linking lean practices with sustainability metrics’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 300-310. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-020188.pdf
  11. Okpala, S.C. and Okpala, C.C. (2026) ‘Six sigma implementation success factors across manufacturing, healthcare, and services: A large-scale multidisciplinary analysis’, International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 311-321. https://ijths.com/wp-content/uploads/IJTHS-020189.pdf
  12. Sarwar, M., Zafar, F., Majeed, I.A., et al. (2022) ‘Selection of suppliers in industrial manufacturing: a fuzzy rough PROMETHEE approach’, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), pp. 6141225.
  13. Shende, T. and Popov, V. (2026) A comparative analysis of MCDA methods for safe and sustainable by design assessment. RSC Sustainability.
  14. Shi, Y., Ma, X., Zhang, P., et al. (2026) ‘A dynamic truck scheduling framework for open-pit mine production under equipment fault uncertainty’, Expert Systems with Applications, 299, pp. 130254.
  15. Tavana, M., Hajipour, V., Abdollahzadeh, V., et al. (2026) ‘An integrated bi-objective multi-factory production and distribution model with direct shipments’, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 212, pp. 111668.
  16. Wofuru-Nyenke, O.K. (2024a) ‘Sustainable lathe machine selection using PROMETHEE’, Future Sustainability, 2(4), pp. 15-21.
  17. Wofuru-Nyenke, O.K. (2021a) ‘Leading-edge production engineering technologies’, Journal of Newviews in Engineering and Technology (JNET), 3(4), pp. 9-17.
  18. Wofuru-Nyenke, O.K. (2021b) ‘Value stream mapping: A tool for waste reduction’, International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 10(6), pp. 13-20.
  19. Wofuru-Nyenke, O.K. (2023a) ‘Analytic hierarchy process modelling for supplier selection in a manufacturing supply chain’, International Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, 9, pp. 27-35.
  20. Wofuru-Nyenke, O.K. (2023b) ‘Mechanized cover crop farming: Modern methods, equipment and technologies’, Circular Agricultural Systems, 3, 6.
  21. Wofuru-Nyenke, O.K. (2024b) ‘Multi-attribute utility theory modelling for product design evaluation’, International Journal of Technology & Engineering Studies, 10(1), pp. 26-33.
  22. Wofuru-Nyenke, O.K., Briggs, T.A., and Aikhuele, D.O. (2023) ‘Advancements in sustainable manufacturing supply chain modelling: A review’, Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 7(1), pp. 3-27.
  23. Wofuru-Nyenke, O.K., Nkoi, B. and Oparadike, F.E. (2019) ‘Waste and cost reduction for a water bottling process using lean six sigma’, European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 4(12), pp. 71-77.
  24. Xu, C., Gao, M., Chen, Y., et al. (2026) ‘MCDA: a novel domain adaptation with multiple classifiers for crop mapping’, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 244, 111450.
  25. Yin, Y., Yang, B., Wang, S., et al. (2026) ‘A multi-layer dynamic production scheduling method for manufacturing systems with cloud-edge-end architecture’, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 69, 103961. 

Rajshahi Medical College and University of Rajshahi, BANGLADESH.



Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Melbourne, AUSTRALIA.




Agri. Services, Islamabad Model College for Girls, and Riphah International University, PAKISTAN.




Kampala International University, UGANDA; Rivers State University, NIGERIA.


Discover more from International Journal of Technology, Health and Sustainability

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading